There may be hope for the Supreme Court

Gogo will now share the correct answers to the Supreme Court Justice Interview Questionnaire we posted. Clearly, the correct answers were not evident to all humans in recent years; but in 2022, things are looking up. A score of 100% is recommended in order to be nominated to the Court.
- Answer to Question 1: YES. You are kind to animals. So far, your potential as a Supreme Court Justice is limitless. Proceed to question 2.
- Answer to Question 2: c) a and b. You would choose to snuggle with a dog and a cat if there were a warm fireplace and a big comfy chair. You could also choose individual options, such as a) a dog, since you may not have had the benefit of cat-snuggle experience yet. Or if you wrote in the margins, “We’re gonna need a bigger ottoman”, that would be acceptable. Speaking as someone who has bony elbows and tends to spill over boundaries and things, I get it. Also there’s the “I’ll need to get up and refill my teacup” option, making above ottoman reference an excellent choice, and the sign of an experienced planner.
Answer to Question 3: d) a, b and c. For a colleague who is being a total jerk face — we’re not just talking nips your tail when you’re sleeping, or hogs all the cushions — we’re talking won’t keep his slobber to himself, never takes his turn to fill the water bowls, and acts like he doesn’t know where all the chow went even though everybody knows he ate it. With such a character, even though we can’t throw him out of the pack, it would be sound judgement to a)Let me bite him on the ankles a little; b)Explain that sometimes we have to do things that are hard so everyone can be ok; and c)Put him on your list of Worst Jerkfaces of All Time, DO NOT GIVE TREATS.
And finally,
Answer to Question 4: d)All of the above. Alas, when there is a really big, loud human who says he needs your help because the Squirrel Mafia came and took all his legumes and hid them, simply telling him to go away, as in choice a), has been proven to be ineffective. Some would say it only encourages the noisy fluffer.
One can try telling the loud human there is no Squirrel Mafia, as in choice b). It’s worth a try. But you may be met with protestations that you have spent too much time with your Fake Optometrist, who has equipped you with Squirrel-blocker glasses so you just can’t see the Squirrel Mafia, and that’s your fault. More tools are needed.
In option c), we ask the loudmouth if he really, but really, had a lot of legumes, or if he just WISHES he had. Again, worth a try. Gives the subject a chance at self-reflection. But this is like waiting for cats to admit they’re not as strong as dogs. Truth hurts. Admission may never come. A combo approach may be our only hope. OR, we can resort to the ankle-nibbling option from Question 3.
Disclaimer: Gogo does not condone violence. Self-defense is important, though. A growl should always be tried before a bite.




